Johnson & Johnson to Face 22 Plaintiffs in Talcum Powder Cancer Case

Trial began Wednesday in a case where twenty-two women have accused Johnson & Johnson of failing to protect consumers. The pharmaceutical and consumer goods company faces claims that it knew that its Baby Powder, Shower to Shower and other talc-based products contained asbestos and failed to warn consumers. Plaintiffs allege that the asbestos-contaminated talc caused their ovarian cancer.

Johnson & Johnson says that its talc products have not and do not contain asbestos and that their products do not cause cancer. But plaintiffs’ lawyer Mark Lanier told the jury in his opening that the company has worked to hide evidence of asbestos in their talc products.

Talcum Powder Cancer Case

This case is a combination of plaintiff strategies against the large corporation. Many cases have claimed that the talc products cause ovarian cancer. A smaller number have claimed that asbestos-tainted talc cause mesothelioma. This case merges the strategies, claiming that the allegedly present asbestos caused patients’ ovarian cancer.

Recently a South Carolina jury failed to reach a verdict in a case where a woman’s family claimed that her death from mesothelioma was due to her use of Johnson & Johnson’s talc products. However, other plaintiffs have succeeded in winning verdicts against the company, with one California woman receiving a $25.75 million verdict in her mesothelioma case against Johnson & Johnson.

The plaintiffs’ lawyer says that recently unsealed documents show that Johnson & Johnson knew since the 1970s that the talc products contained asbestos but directed its employees to reassure consumers that the products did not contain asbestos.

Imerys SA, the Paris-based mineral company that supplies Johnson & Johnson’s talc, was also originally named in this suit, but settled claims against it for over $5 million.

The outcome of this trial could bear on the more than 9,000 talcum powder lawsuits that Johnson & Johnson currently faces. The trial is expected to last six weeks.

The suit is Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson, No. 1522-CC10417, Circuit Court, City of St. Louis, Missouri.

Free Case Evaluation

Get in touch with our lawyers for a free and confidential case review by calling us toll free at 1 (888) 402-5552 or by filling out the form below.

DISCLAIMER: No attorney client relationship will exist between you and our firm until we enter into a signed Retainer/Services Agreement. Completion of this document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a Retainer/Services Agreement. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions this website may be considered lawyer advertising. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. Click here for more information.

Back To More Articles